81) Arushi was to multiply a number by 2.4, but instead multiplied by 4.2. If the product she obtained was 65.1, then what is the correct product that she should have got?
A) 36.50
B) 46.88
C) 37.20
D) 113.93
View Answer
C) 37.20
Explanation:We are told:
* Arushi was supposed to multiply a number by 2.4
* But she multiplied by 4.2 instead and got 65.1
—
Step 1: Let the original number be x
She actually did:
—
Step 2: Correct product =
2.4 × 15.5 = 37.2
—
✅ Correct Answer: 37.20
82) The intervention by the monetary authority of a country in the money market to Keep the money supply stable against external shocks is called _________.
A) sterilisation
B) reserve deposit
C) speculative demand
D) statutory liquidity
View Answer
A) sterilisation
83) Select the number from among the given options that can replace the question mark (?) in the following series.
86, 89, 95, 104, ?, 131, 149
A) 122
B) 116
C) 114
D) 113
View Answer
B) 116
Explanation:We are given the number series:
86, 89, 95, 104, ?, 131, 149
Let’s find the pattern by looking at the differences:
* 89 − 86 = 3
* 95 − 89 = 6
* 104 − 95 = 9
We see the differences are increasing by 3.
Let’s continue this pattern:
* Next difference = 12 → 104 + 12 = 116
* Next difference = 15 → 116 + 15 = 131
* Next difference = 18 → 131 + 18 = 149
✅ The pattern holds: +3, +6, +9, +12, +15, +18
—
✅ Correct Answer: 2. 116
84) Who laid the foundation stone of Shri Parvati Temple at Somnath in August 2021?
A) Narendra Modi
B) Amit Shah
C) Bhupendra Patel
D) Vijay Rupani
View Answer
A) Narendra Modi
85) Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s)from the statements.
Statements:
Some dogs are donkeys.
No donkey is a horse.
Conclusions:
I.Some dogs are not horses.
II. Some horses are dogs
A) Only conclusion II follows.
B) Both conclusions I and II follow.
C) Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
D) Only conclusion I follows.
View Answer
D) Only conclusion I follows.
Explanation:We are given:
—
Statements:
⇒1. Some dogs are donkeys.
⇒2. No donkey is a horse.
—
Conclusions:
I. Some dogs are not horses.
II. Some horses are dogs.
—
Let’s analyze:
Conclusion I: Some dogs are not horses.
* From the statements, we know some dogs are donkeys and no donkey is a horse.
* So, those dogs that are donkeys cannot be horses.
* Hence, some dogs (those that are donkeys) are definitely not horses ✅
✓ Conclusion I follows.
—
Conclusion II: Some horses are dogs.
* There is no direct link in the statements to prove this.
* Nothing in the statements says any horse is a dog or vice versa ❌
Conclusion II does not follow.
—
✅ Correct Answer: 4. Only conclusion I follows.